EN

Art. 27 · high-risk · fundamental rights

FRIA: the Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment under the EU AI Act

The Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment (FRIA) is a separate obligation for certain high-risk AI uses. For financial institutions, it is especially relevant for creditworthiness assessment and life/health insurance risk assessment and pricing.

What the FRIA is

Art. 27 EU AI Act requires an assessment of the impact on fundamental rights before certain high-risk AI systems are deployed. The FRIA complements a data protection impact assessment, but does not automatically replace it.

Who is particularly affected in the financial sector

Art. 27 particularly covers deployers of high-risk AI systems under Annex III 5(b) and 5(c). For banks and insurers, the FRIA question is therefore especially relevant for creditworthiness assessment of natural persons and for risk assessment and pricing in life and health insurance.

Annex IIIAreaTypical systems
5(b)Access to essential private and public servicesAI-supported creditworthiness assessment of natural persons, credit scoring, decision support for loan applications
5(c)Life and health insuranceAI-supported risk assessment and pricing for natural persons
4EmploymentHR AI is high-risk relevant; whether private financial institutions have a FRIA obligation must be assessed separately under Art. 27.

Required contents under Art. 27

  • description of the processes in which the AI system is used
  • duration and frequency of use
  • categories of affected natural persons and groups
  • specific fundamental-rights risks in the concrete context
  • human oversight measures
  • measures if a risk materialises
  • after completion: notification of the results to the market surveillance authority using the envisaged template, unless an exemption applies

Fundamental rights relevant to financial services

Fundamental rightTypical relevance
Non-discriminationBias in credit, pricing, underwriting or HR processes
Protection of personal dataFinancial data, health data, creditworthiness data and profiling
Right to an effective remedyTraceability and contestability of AI-supported decisions
Human dignity and fair treatmentAvoidance of degrading or fully uncontrolled decisions

Coordinating FRIA and DPIA

Where personal data is processed and a high risk to individuals exists, a data protection impact assessment under Art. 35 GDPR must also be assessed. Art. 27 EU AI Act expressly provides that the FRIA can complement a DPIA. In practice, a shared analysis process with separately traceable outcomes is sensible.

When the FRIA is prepared

The FRIA must be carried out before the first use of the relevant high-risk AI system and updated if key elements change or are no longer current. For systems already in use, remediation should be included in the AI governance roadmap.

Would you like to know where your institution stands?

We can discuss your specific situation and prioritise the next steps towards auditable AI governance.

Request an initial conversation
Notice: This page is for general information. Whether a FRIA is mandatory in a specific case depends on role, system, Annex III category and use context. Status: June 2026.